![]() However, I now recommend Atticus instead, since it has better formatting capability and several other features that Scrivener lacks. Windows version is objectively inferior to Mac versionīottom Line: For a long time, Scrivener was my go-to writing software, and it is still a good option for most writers.Formatting tools are far too complicated.No real-time collaboration or co-author functionality.Cannot open DOC files or ODT files (though Scrivener does import DOCX files).It can be complicated to learn all of Scrivener’s many useful features.Offers a full 30-day free trial that only counts the days you actually open Scrivener. ![]() More affordable than comparable writing software.Can export (or “compile”) projects as EPUB, MOBI, PDF, RTF, RTFD, DOC, DOCX, OTD, HTML, TXT, or even FDX, MD, and FOUNTAIN files.Comments, footnotes, annotations, and synopses simplify keeping track of your stream-of-consciousness brainstorming.Templates to fit your writing needs (fiction, nonfiction, screenplay, poem, essay, etc.).Composition Mode erases all distractions and lets you write on a screen of nothing but text, though you can customize the background to be a texture or image as well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |